fallen generic safe viagra
two generic viagra 100mg
from buy viagra locally
buy overseas viagra
no viagra cheapest online
walk viagra free sample
gun tadalafil
try viagra generic
first list generic viagra
cialis viagra
cialis drug
generic cialis tadalafil
viagra cost in canada
generic for cialis
their cialis soft tabs
q online cialis
viagra order uk
viagra england
but cialis toll free
little viagra price list
lowest price cialis
nd viagra uk cheap purchase buy
q buy viagra online
their low price viagra
sacramento buy cialis
hear try cialis free
buy levitra online
tadalafil without prescription
marajuana and viagra
cialis patent search
viagra high bloodpressure
mg levitra
okay a href order viagra online a
head latest news side effects viagra
there levitra meeting agendas
levitra and women
herbal viagra replacements
mind cialis comparison diflucan viagra
those purchase viagra and cialis
same find viagra free sites edinburgh search
levitra pricing
tell sildenafil kamagra oral jelly
homemade sildenafil citrate
little eating watermlon is like taking viagra
grneric viagra
all viagra triangle chicago
cialis and online consultation
kamagra viagra cheap
door plaintiffs lawsuit on viagra update 2008
broken zenegra citrate over sea sildenafil
toward what is the alternative to viagra
he cialis from india
why 2cialis levitra viagra vs vs
levitra warning
ranbaxy viagra
vardenafil hydrochloride prescription medication
Banner
Banner
Children need full families PDF Print E-mail
Written by Fritz Chapin   
Monday, 20 February 2012 22:02

altA report from The New York Times on Sunday has brought an alarming statistic to light.  It found that in 2009, more than half of new mothers gave birth to their children outside of marriage.

The reasoning for this — the normalization of “contemporary” families and government social safety nets.  According to the American Family Association, a contemporary family is any family that does not fall under the category of a mother, father and children.  According to its studies, this is a dangerous trend, as children of contemporary families tend to have higher instances of falling into poverty, failing in schools and suffering emotional and behavioral problems.

The AFA also has a higher instance of continuing the cycle of children being born outside of marriages or being born into marriages that end in divorce.  It has also been argued by sociologists and psychologists that a lack of family, meaning both parents living and raising children together, lends to the loss of conservative values that this country was founded upon.

When the Times went to Lorain, Ohio, which had the highest instance of unmarried mothers under 30 at 63 percent, it reported the main reason they could remain single was because of government social programs.  One mother, who remained unnamed, said that because she could rely on the government to provide free daycare, food stamps and healthcare, she didn’t need to marry the man she conceived three children with.  The reason she gave for not marrying him? He couldn’t be trusted.

So to clarify, she wanted to have children with a man she had no intentions of marrying, so the government had to step in and use tax money, almost none of which she contributed because she fell into the 49.8 percent of Americans who don’t pay income tax.  That is insane.

We need to get back to having children in stable marriages, if not for the sake of our debt, which is being rung up by outrageous amounts of social programs, but for our future children.  Children need to be brought up in homes with two parents, preferably a mother and a father, because that is what nature intended to happen.  Children who are brought up in a classic nuclear family model are three times more likely to not only graduate college and become successful, but they are also more likely to have children in a marriage when they can afford to take care of them.

Having children is not a right, it is a privilege and a responsibility, but most people in our generation don’t know the meaning of those two words.