facebook ProBoards twitter tumblr RSS feed YouTube

Weekly Poll

After the Eagles 48-3 win over Savannah State, could 2010 be the year for a seventh national championship?
 
Students and Faculty Gather to Protest Ayers Cancelation
Written by Chris Buchanan   
Tuesday, 03 March 2009 02:15
Over 40 students and faculty gathered in the “Free-Speech” zone outside the Russell Union Rotunda Monday night in a peaceful “Sit-In” protest of the canceled visit by controversial figure Bill Ayers.

 

Event co-organizer and Georgia Southern professor Michelle Haberland explained her reasoning for holding the event.

 

“I happen to teach the course ‘The United States in the 1960s’ and my class was very excited to hear that Bill Ayers was coming to campus and then the university decided to rescind that invitation,” Haberland said. “I will go to great lengths to defend my students’ right to learn,” she said.

 

The protest was held on the night that Ayers was scheduled to visit Georgia Southern University as part of the Multicultural Student Center's Spring calendar.

The event was canceled last month following concerns from the university that included the security and expense that Ayers’s visit would have entailed according to Vice President of Student Affairs and Enrollment Management, Teresa Thompson.

 

Students and faculty who attended the event had the chance to stand up before fellow protestors and voice their displeasure with the university’s decision.

 

Earlier Monday, Thompson stressed that the decision was strictly budget related and that no written contract was made. Some students and faculty at the protest felt there was more to the story.

 

“I don’t buy that at all,” said Carlyn Pinkins, a history graduate student, “I think that it was used as an excuse to keep people from getting angry.”

 

During the event, questions also arose involving where the group could protest according to Haberland.

 

“I was under the impression by the George Bush experience and by walking by the rotunda that this was the ‘Free-Speech’ zone and I was informed that this was not the ‘Free-Speech’ zone,” said Haberland.

 

“The university attorney explained to me that this was not a department-sponsored event and as such could not be held in the rotunda,” she said.

 

Instead, the protest was held on the periphery of the structure.

Since the cancelation, the university has also attracted the attention of the American Association of University Professors (AAUP).

 

Thompson said that the AAUP contacted her by phone regarding the cancelation and that by the end of their discussion the AAUP representative understood their decision.

“I explained all of that to Mr. [Hugh] Hudson and obviously he understood that in light of all the budget cuts that are not only going all around the country but also in Georgia, that it was a reasonable response to the situation,” Thompson said.

 

Currently the AAUP website highlights a similar scenario at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln in which Ayers was denied entry because of security concerns.

 

According to that highlight, "faculty groups, including the AAUP, expressed concern that the rescission of the speaking invitation was inconsistent with principles of academic freedom."

 

No reference to Georgia Southern's specific case, however, is available on the site or in its public archives.

 

During the protest Haberland said that she hopes to raise enough money to bring Ayers next fall.

Comments
Add New RSS
Kim Weckwert 03-03-2009 09:27 am CET

The University did the right thing in cancelling this event. Teachers such as Haberland, who are clearing pushing their own agenda, should do so off the campus and with their own money! There is nothing free about free speech. It has been bought and paid for through the sacrifice and lives of countless great Americans. Ayers is NOT among that list. Be grateful for a country where you are allowed to express your opinion. Those protesting did so in a peaceful manner, and that is to their credit.
Carlyn P. 03-03-2009 07:37 pm CET

the university did the right thing cancelling the event

education majors - people about to graduate - have lost out. I guess you don't care; nobody influential in your major field has been cancelled or barred from campus. If someone you wanted to hear was prevented from speaking, you'd want others to care and
you'd want their tax dollars (in the case of teachers like Haberland)and student fees to pay for them to speak here.

Free speech isn't free

Of course it's free! If it wasn't free, it wouldn't be called "free"
speech. Those soldiers that have fought and died to protect your constitutionally-protected, First-Amendment right aren't doing it under the caveat that those that exercise
it can't say what they want. If you have a problem with people saying
things that you don't agree with, maybe you shouldn't be American. Maybe a move to China might be up your alley.

Ayers is not among the list of countless great Americans...

I don't think anybody condones the actions of Ayers and the Weather
Underground back in the 60's, but I think I'm not alone in being
thankful that neither you nor Sarah Palin get to decide who's on that
list, if such a list were to exist. But I respect that you don't care for
Bill Ayers. A lot of people don't care for him, but would still respect his
right to speak.

C'mon, earning a degree from any university should demonstrate that you have an ability to think for yourself. If you're going to allow someone who can't name a single newspaper she's ever read in a television interview to influence your decisions about other people and their right to freedom of speech, I think you have two options: 1) start to actually think for yourself or 2) find a much smarter person to
influence your decisions.
John Robert Wehr II 03-10-2009 05:33 pm CET

Carlyn you are a sad and ungrateful individual. Judging solely on the comment you posted you’re an even worse patriot. I don’t want to come off to harsh or discredit your obvious in-depth knowledge of our constitution in any way, shape or form. So for your sound grammar and orderly sentence structures I’ll favor you a couple points. Now William Ayers and politics aside for a moment. First and foremost FREEDOM IS NOT FREE! Do you honestly deem yourself worthy enough to even begin to question the legality or interpretation of our Nation’s Constitution with your thoughtless lack of appreciation for those who have made the ultimate sacrifice? I suggest you read the following numbers very closely over and over again and reflect to yourself silently for a moment and explain to me in a reply comment how you calculate the casualties of America’s fallen heroes and come up with a “free” tab. Contradictory to your failure and inability to recognize and fully appreciate the price America’s brave men and women (past and present from every branch) who in a moment’s notice will put their life on the line and go above and beyond the call of duty to get the job done. Taking one last look at U.S. soil as they disappear into the sky headed towards a foreign land knowing there’s no guarantee they’ll be returning home alive or in the same condition they left home in. Here are the price’s America has paid to be free. Freedom would not be Freedom today (or maybe even freedom at all) without these brave individuals who served and gave their lives for our great country. Along with the veterans of today and those who have served in other foreign conflicts and are/were fortunate enough to return home safely you are ALL MY HEROES. There aren’t enough thanks in the world to go around for what you have done not only for your home country but the world as a whole! WWI = 53,402….WWII = 291,557… Korean Conflict = 33,741…. Vietnam Conflict= 47,424….Persian Gulf War = 147….Iraq = 31809

The only thing I will say a/b the William Ayers thing is short and sweet b/c he's really not worth wasting my breath on. Look at the U.S. Gov't as our "mother".What is a mother's job? To protect her baby right? ok your defense is he's changed, he's so wonderful now... yadda yadda yadda.. I don't know about you but I know if that radical piece of sh*t organized bombings or lets say for the analogy sake tried to kill/hurt my mom(even if it were 30 some odd yrs. ago)...which is technically his mom to b/c he lived in the US and receives the gov'ts protections then just as he does now.Say he succeeded in killing your mom and got away w/ murder.. would you forgive him 30 yrs. later? What about if he told you to your face he wasn't sorry for killing your mom and if she were alive he'd kill her again?

You are terribly hypocritical as well i.e. You tell Kim "maybe you shouldn't be American if you have a problem with people saying things that she doesn't agree with". Well if you play by your own rules China sounds up your alley as well cause after all aren't you complaining b/c you don't like what she had to say??? hhhmmmm? I'm not a Palin fan so I'm not taking sides on this one but I must say... you must not be the sharpest tack in the box. your attempting to suggest to "find a much smarter person to influence your decisions" referring to Palin... this is coming from a person who throws stones in her own glass house and wants to take advice from a man who at one time or another organized bombings on the pentagon, police stations, and even blew up his girlfriend Diana Oughton and two close friends Ted Gold and Terry Robbins in the Greenwich Village townhomes with a nail bomb.... you supplement your main points with GREAT reasoning.

Delusional maybe?
Carlyn Pinkins 03-11-2009 07:13 am CET

Hey John,

Thanks for the comment. I'm up for a good debate and it looks like I might have to look elsewhere, but I'll entertain you since you tried.

FIRSTLY, for all the great reading comprehension and intelligence you claim to possess, I don't know how on earth you discerned that I don't appreciate or "I'm ungrateful" for the sacrifices that our men in uniform make to protect me and all the things I love. Oh, but then again, that is the assumption that all the "self-righteous patriots" make when people don't use their constitutionally-protected freedoms the way they think they ought to be used. FREE SPEECH is free - that was what I posted. I'll say again, maybe I should do it in a different way, since you had trouble understanding me. Our brave men and women in uniform aren't fighting so that they can tell us how we can and can't use the freedoms we have given to us by the Constitution - they're fighting to make sure that we still have them. If you stayed awake in history, you might remember something about the American Revolution starting with men and women questioning and speaking and acting out against a government they loved but felt had betrayed them. Having said that, freedom of speech is fundamental in this country, and all citizens whether you like or agree with them or not, has that freedom. Just because you have problems with how someone uses it doesn't mean they love their country any less. By the way, you can try to school me on the Constitution when you master basic reading.

I love your tirade about a guy that you're not willing to waste your breath on, by the way. I agree with keeping talk on him short and sweet because you don't know what you're talking about and it's really besides the point. Diana Oughton, Terry Robbins and Ted Gold were killed when a bomb THEY were constructing went off - Ayers didn't kill them. I'll say again that I don't condone anything Ayers did and I don't know a single person that does. However, Ayers is still an American (whether you like it or not), he still has the same rights that you and I have (whether you like it or not), and those rights should be respected. I won't go into the issues I have with "looking at gov't as mother" thing, but I will tell you that I know a woman who lost her mother in the 1996 Olympic bombing. She made the trip to Atlanta to see Eric Rudolph's trial and testified, in that courtroom and in front of the whole world, that she forgave him. I'll let you meditate on that one.

Oh and about the glass house thing, Mr. Sharp Tack and Excellent Reader, I don't have a problem with Ms. Weckwert not liking Bill Ayers based on Palin's campaign propaganda as I said (something else you obviously didn't read). My issue is with people, like yourself, that can go on for hours about patriotism, rights and freedoms and then support the suppression of another person's freedoms in the same breath. When people do that, it proves that they don't understand the Constitution that they claim to love and don't really support freedom. If you want the authority to dictate who has rights and who doesn't, and what somebody should do with them, you should go live somewhere else. Unlike you, I would never dream of trying to suppress someone's rights simply because I don't agree with them or like what they do or did. But I will exercise my right to voice my disagreement. It's been...entertaining.
Chris 02-06-2010 01:40 pm CET

Wow! Kim didn't even mention Palin or how she feels about Palin. How then, Carlyn, could you attatch her opinion of Ayers to Palin? Very bad form Carlyn! I think you read more into her post than was really there.
She stated, you vented, John explained and defended his thoughts on the subject, and then you ranted at him. You came off as someone who always has to be right and will belittle those who have an opposing view.
John's post actually exposes you for what you are....a well educated idot...someone who has learned a great deal, but understands nothing! Reguardless, I've enjoyed reading the "banter" between you both!
Write comment
Name:
Email:
 
Title:
Please input the anti-spam code that you can read in the image.

3.26 Copyright (C) 2008 Compojoom.com / Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved."